The utility sells power under tariff. An equipment vendor sells equipment. An engineering firm sells a design. An efficiency contractor optimizes the existing plant.
Who they can callWhat that party sellsWhat it will not do
The utility
Power, under published tariff
Does not own the customer’s chillers, does not carry the customer’s capital cycle, and is not structured to contract for a multi-day island runway on one campus.
Equipment vendors
Equipment
Does not finance it, own it, or carry its performance for twenty-five years.
Engineering firms
A design
Does not take asset risk, operating risk, or the consequence of the design being wrong in year twelve.
Efficiency contractors
Savings against a baseline
Optimizes the existing asset rather than replacing it — and a more efficient old chiller is still an old chiller, and still stops when the grid does.
None of them takes the problem.
That is not a technology gap. District energy, cogeneration, and thermal storage are mature and running at scale. It is a counterparty gap — and it is the gap Siena Energy exists to close.